VANCOUVER -- The federal government must be forced
to pressure the International Olympic Committee
to include women's ski-jumping in the 2010 Winter
Olympic Games in Vancouver -- or fund a parallel
event for the female sport, says a complaint to
the federal human-rights arbiter.
"We believe that the exclusion
of women from an Olympic facility [the ski jump]
and an event [ski jumping] in Canada, with major
funding coming from the Department of Canadian Heritage,
constitutes a discriminatory practice," wrote
Jan Willis, mother of 15-year-old Katie Willis,
Canada's top female ski-jumper and ranked sixth
in the world.
The government of Canada, through the Department
of Canadian Heritage, has spent $310-million to
cover infrastructure and legacy costs, some of which
is being used to build a ski-jump facility in the
Callaghan Valley, near Whistler.
The complaint about that funding was filed with
the Canadian Human Rights Commission, which hears
complaints of discrimination in areas of federal
jurisdiction. The commission now has the option
to dismiss the complaint or to mediate between the
parties.
If mediation is unsuccessful, the commission sends
the case to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal,
a quasi-judicial body whose rulings can be enforced
by federal court.
It's unlikely that the court would have jurisdiction
over the IOC, but the international body's actions
in Canada can be served with a cease-and-desist
order, and an order to correct the practice.
That order could take the shape of an alternative
competition, said Nina Reid, who is counsel to Ms.
Willis and the other female members of Canada's
nine-member national ski-jumping team: Atsuko Tanaka,
14, Nata DeLeeuw, 15, and Zoya Lynch, 15.
"It would allow the women to compete there,
and have a venue," said Ms. Willis in an interview.
"All these girls want to do is compete and
have a chance at a podium. It's hard to want to
jump and be told that you can't."
Spokespeople for the Department of Canadian Heritage,
the International Olympic Committee, and the office
of David Emerson, the minister responsible for the
Olympics, said they would not comment until they
had more time to examine the filing.
A senior official with the Vancouver Organizing
Committee for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter
Games rejected the idea of a parallel competition.
"It's very unrealistic to think they would
be able to host any kind of event during the Olympic
period," said Tim Gayda, vice-president of
sport for VANOC, adding that decisions about which
sport to include are made at least three years in
advance, and that those decisions for the 2010 Games
have already been made.
Last year, the international governing body for
skiing, FIS, recommended that female ski jumpers
be included in the 2010 Olympic program. Last fall,
VANOC also wrote a letter in support of the women's
inclusion. But in November the IOC's program commission
cancelled the initiative.
"The IOC knowingly put the federal government
in the untenable position of funding an event that
unjustifiably excludes women," wrote Jan Willis
in the filing. "Such exclusion is a prohibited
ground of discrimination."
The filing also hints that the acceptance of women
in sport has been slow to evolve, quoting the current
FIS president, Gian-Franco Kasper, saying that ski
jumping "is not appropriate for ladies from
a medical point of view." The filing acknowledges
that Mr. Kasper is now supportive of the inclusion
of women jumpers.
Olympics that take place in Canada have to accord
by Canadian law even though it's the IOC that decides
which events are included, said Canada's representative
on the FIS Council, Patrick Smith.
It is not clear what jurisdiction the tribunal will
have, said Mr. Smith, who is also an Ontario Superior
Court judge. "Nobody knows about this for sure
-- it's new territory."
The real strength of the jumpers' court action may
likely be political, he said. The FIS council will
examine this action at its next meeting, he said,
and depending on the outcome could appeal the matter
to the IOC directly.